Will Advanced Attackers Laugh At Your WAF?

Companies should not trust vendors claims about Web application firewalls, says security engineer who at Black Hat USA will show 150 different ways attackers can get around Web defenses

Companies worried about their Web security cannot just deploy a Web application firewall (WAF) in front of their sites and call it a day. Using a variety of tricks -- including, in a few cases, just adding a single character -- a knowledgeable attacker could bypass the additional security offered by WAFs, according to research that will be presented at the Black Hat USA security conference next week.
From the simple handling of file names and path names, to more complex multipart and unicode parsing, different Web servers and security software handle the HTTP protocol in different ways. By exploiting the disconnect between a Web server and its WAF, an attacker could bypass defenses to exploit vulnerabilities in a Web server, says Ivan Ristic, director of engineering for vulnerability management firm Qualys, who will present his research at Black Hat.
This is about attacking the way that a Web application firewall interprets data streams, says Ristic, who has developed WAFs for more than a decade, including the creation of the open-source WAF ModSecurity. There has not been a good public discussion and disclosure of these issues, aside for the occasional vulnerability.
While there has not been a large number of attackers that have used evasion techniques to date, the increasing use of WAFs means that attackers will have to adapt and find ways around them. To help improve the ability of customers and penetration testers to gauge the security of WAFs, Ristic plans to release a set of nearly 150 tests for a variety of security weaknesses that he had identified in current WAFs.
Being able to test a vendors product before deploying it could help immensely, says Paul Sop, technology evangelist for attack-mitigation firm Prolexic. His company tested a handful of systems and had little trouble bypassing all of them. For most companies, however, that level of evaluation will be out of their capabilities.
There are many, many different attack vectors, and you have to kind of somehow know which attack vector maps to which features and how do you test it, he says. How do you certify and prove that this control that you just activated actually works?
[ Two researchers release a hacking tool called Waldo to test for WebSocket vulnerabilities and potential attack vectors, which will be demonstrated at Black Hat USA. See
Waldo Finds Ways To Abuse HTML5 WebSockets
. ]
A strong set of tests could help customers check on vendors claims and help vendors improve their systems, he says. In addition, many companies only turn on the features necessary to be PCI-compliant rather than tuning the WAF to their environment.
To turn on a certain abstract feature of a WAF, you have to know a lot about the HTTP protocol and the application that you are protecting, Sop says. If you dont turn on a protection for something, then its not going to do anything.
Luckily, the run-of-the-mill attacker will likely not be dodging their targets WAF any time soon, says Qualys Ristic. Designing evasions for WAFs requires a lot of knowledge about the systems, he says.
These are advanced attacks, so the obvious attackers wont use them, he says. Developing these types of attacks takes a lot of dedication. I would expect these evasion techniques to be used when a high-value target is involved.
The security technologies add an extra layer of security in front of a public website catching attacks against vulnerabilities that developers may have missed or that have gone unpatched. Overall, WAFs are a good security technology, but need a great deal more research, Ristic argues. In addition, vendors need to be more transparent regarding their technologies and products, he says.
Users, in general, should make it clear to the vendors that they care about the quality in WAFs, he says. I have been involved in WAF development for 10 years, but Im disappointed by the current state of the market.
Have a comment on this story? Please click Add Your Comment below. If youd like to contact
Dark Readings
editors directly,
send us a message
.

Last News
▸ Scan suggests Heartbleed patches may not have been successful. ◂ Discovered: 23/12/2024 Category: security	▸ IoT Devices on Average Have 25 Vulnerabilities ◂ Discovered: 23/12/2024 Category: security	▸ DHS-funded SWAMP scans code for bugs. ◂ Discovered: 23/12/2024 Category: security

**Cyber Security Categories**
Google Dorks Database	Exploits Vulnerability	Exploit Shellcodes

CVE List

Tools/Apps