When DDoS Isnt All About Massive Disruption

New data shows prevalence of often-undetectable DDoS attacks aimed at quietly wreaking havoc on the network while performing data exfiltration and other attacks.

Theres the long-lasting, loud DDoS attack that takes down a website or disrupts a companys network operations, but theres also a stealthier, shorter-burst DDoS meant to fly under the radar while sapping just enough bandwidth or network resources to perform more nefarious activity, like silently stealing information.
That type of DDoS, which doesnt suck massive amounts of bandwidth so may not be easily detectable, is typically just one element of a multi-vector attack: DDoS attacks of under 5 gigabits-per-second at peak and lasting less than 10 minutes represent nearly 80% of the DDoS attack attempts spotted by in-line DDoS prevention vendor Corero Network Security, the company says in a new report published today.
The goal of this short, low-saturation DDoS is typically to bypass security defenses or to consume security logs and to ultimately hide other activity the attackers have under way, says Dave Larson, CTO and vice president of products at Corero.
Corero also found a large number of short-burst DDoS attacks lasting anywhere from 5- to 30 minutes. Some 96% of DDoS attacks against its service provider and enterprise customers networks lasted less than 30 minutes, and 73%, less than five minutes.
These mini-DDoS attacks shouldnt be confused with low-and-slow attacks against the application layer, such as Slowloris-style ones, Larson says, which are often tailored to for true denial-of-service purposes.
Its a smokescreen effect, Larson says of the short-burst network DDoS attacks. If they send [traffic] in short-duration, 3 Gig packet rates [at the most], its not going to cause service degradation in a large data center, Larson says. You might see that class of attack good enough to degrade a firewall or IPS … It might allow a connection to remain open during the attack.
These attacks leave plenty of headroom for attackers to execute an exploit, he says, all under the cover of a quiet DDoS attack. The victim doesnt even know it occurred because it may not be noticeable.
This brand of DDoS is likely the handiwork of more sophisticated attackers such as nation-state cyberspies, who use it to pilfer sensitive information, he says. DDoS can be useful to degrade the security perimeter, and this can be sent at a rate that saturates all the logs, he says.
Thats not to say the mega-DDoS attacks amassing hundreds of Gbps arent still alive and kicking, of course. We see the small and the big attacks, Larson says, because Coreros product sits inline in the network. Our data doesnt negate the prevalence of large and long attacks, he says.
But Coreros data, as well as data from
recent reports by Arbor Networks and the Akamai PLXsert
, show how DDoS attacks are evolving -- and continue to be a popular tool. About half of all enterprises suffered a DDoS attack last year and most ISPs and enterprises also suffered more stealthy DDoS attacks aimed at flying under the radar, according to Arbors 10
th
Annual Worldwide Infrastructure Security Report, published in January.
Nearly 30% of the DDoS attacks Arbor sees are for hiding data exfiltration or other types of compromises.
Dan Holden, director of Arbor’s security engineering and response team, says a 5Gbps or below attack would be plenty to take down most websites. Thats the type of attack thats the majority of attacks today, he notes.
Its difficult to get a good read on low-and-slow network DDoS attacks that are used as part of a bigger attack, he says. Smaller organizations are more likely to suffer with these because they dont have the resources to detect and deflect them, he says.
DDoS trends go up and down and the change depends on whos being attacked and what the attackers are after, he says. DDoS wont die because its so inexpensive for the attacker to execute, while expensive for organizations to defend against, he says.
Application-layer attacks, meanwhile, are the scariest, Holden says. The attack surface of a server is large, he notes, and an attacker who wages one of these higher-layer attacks is likely very determined. He points to the wave of DDoS attacks against US banks a couple of years ago, when some bank websites went offline even with help from ISPs scrubbing the network traffic-layer attacks. There were instances where ISPs were able to scrub volumetric DDoS attacks, but the website still fell because of an application-layer attack, Holden says. It takes someone who really cares to go after [an organization] to go after the application layer.
[Everything you need to know about today’s IT security challenges – but were afraid to ask. Register with Discount Code DRBLOG to save $100 for this special one-day event,
Dark Readings Cyber Security Crash Course at Interop on Wednesday, April 29
.]
So how can an organization actually defend against nearly invisible DDoS attacks? The only way to do this is to change your sampling or thresholds so youre looking at lower events of interest in traditional DDoS products and services, Coreros Larson says.
Another option is to run an inline anti-DDoS tool, which both Corero and Arbor sell.
Meanwhile, companies are getting hit with an average of 3.9 DDoS attack attempts of various size and duration each day, according to
Coreros data
. One of Coreros customers suffered an average of 12 DDoS attacks per day against its data center infrastructure during a three-month period.

Last News
▸ ArcSight prepares for future at user conference post HP acquisition. ◂ Discovered: 07/01/2025 Category: security	▸ Samsung Epic 4G: First To Use Media Hub ◂ Discovered: 07/01/2025 Category: security	▸ Many third-party software fails security tests ◂ Discovered: 07/01/2025 Category: security

**Cyber Security Categories**
Google Dorks Database	Exploits Vulnerability	Exploit Shellcodes

CVE List

Tools/Apps

News/Aarticles

Phishing Database

Deepfake Detection

Trends/Statistics & Live Infos

Tags:
When DDoS Isnt All About Massive Disruption