What Does China-Russia No Hack Pact Mean For US?

Experts dont really believe the countries will stop cyberspying on each other. The pact is more to further the alternative Internet governance agenda.

Russia and China on Friday signed a pact agreeing not to hit one another with cyberattacks. Experts agree, however, that the countries dont actually have any intention of ceasing their cyberespionage campaigns against each other. They say that the agreement instead is political posturing intended to send a message to the United States and its allies, though they differ slightly on what that message is, what motivated Russia and China to send it, and what it means for the U.S.
The nations also agreed to exchange technology, share information between their law enforcement agencies, and jointly counteract technology that may destabilize the internal political and socio-economic atmosphere, disturb public order or interfere with the internal affairs of the state, as the
Wall Street Journal
reports.
Tom Kellermann, chief cybersecurity officer of Trend Micro, says this is a natural progression of the economic and military relationship Russia and China have already had together since the Shanghai Cooperation Organization was established in 2001. He says this announcement could be happening now as a reaction to two things: the U.S-backed efforts to change Japans pacifist constitution to allow Japans Self-Defense Forces to engage in combat overseas (which would naturally extend to combat in cyberspace) and the U.S.s new, more aggressive cybersecurity strategy.
Last month, the
U.S. Department of Defense announced a new cybersecurity strategy
and revealed that Russian hackers had accessed an unclassified DoD network. Also last month, a Department of Justice official explained that the U.S. is giving
no free passes
to cybercriminals, regardless of whether or not they are nation-state actors. This Russian-Chinese cybersecurity pact could be seen, says Kellermann, as a way of the two countries presenting a united front against the U.S.
As Kellermann puts it, Oh, Mr. Secretary of Defense, youre taking the gloves off? Well, theres two of us. Now what?
When the U.S. pursues active defense against one of them, will [Russia and China] respond collectively? says Kellermann. Thats the inevitable question.
Others say this is an effort probably instigated by the Russians to bolster their stance on Internet governance. Opinions about Internet governance are polarized around openness and sovereignty; Russia and China are largely aligned on the side of sovereignty.
Russians have tried to shape how the Chinese think about these issues, says James Lewis, senior fellow and program director of the Center for Strategic and International Studies. The Chinese just went along with it because anything the U.S. disagrees with cant be all bad.
Having two super-powers allied as a united front helps further the agenda in the international debate.
As Richard Bejtlich, Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institute explains, these nations definition of information security is closer to information control, including censorship and surveillance.
Lewis explains that the countries tactics on information control are slightly different -- the Chinese are very focused on censorship, while the Russians, he says, have pervasive surveillance and a greater willingness to use physical force.
Bejtlich says that by the agreement to jointly counteract technology that may disturb public order, Russia and China may be sharing technologies that improve surveillance or help automate censorship, which is still largely manual in China.
He does not, however, think that they would share malware, at least not anything significant. Possibly they might share some low-level stuff to show good will, says Bejtlich, but those nations arent going to share serious tricks of the trade because they have each have teams established specifically for cyberspying on the other and he doesnt expect that to change just because they agreed not to hack each other.
I think theyre trying to push the norm of not going to attack each others critical infrastructure, says Bejtlich.
Its hard to know how close the partnership really is. Well know how seriously to take this when we see Chinese sources report it, says Lewis. The Chinese havent said anything.
Lewis also says the Russians made the announcement largely to jerk the Americans chain. Were always asking for law enforcement cooperation. What better way to irritate us than to cooperate with someone else?
Will this closer partnership, if it is indeed closer, have any impact on Western law enforcements efforts to pursue cybercriminals in Russia and China?
Bejtlich proposed one possibility. Suppose the U.S. and the Dutch are planning to capture a Russian cybercriminal while hes on vacation in Holland and a Chinese law enforcement agency gets wind of it? Maybe the Chinese officials would give their Russian counterparts a call. I wouldnt be surprised if they said The Americans are gonna pounce; get your guy out of there, says Bejtlich.
Kellermann says that this pact may just be posturing on the part of China and Russia, but that doesnt mean it shouldnt be taken seriously. If theyre saying theyre no longer pointing their guns at each other, says Kellermann, the guns have to be faced somewhere.

Last News
▸ ArcSight prepares for future at user conference post HP acquisition. ◂ Discovered: 07/01/2025 Category: security	▸ Samsung Epic 4G: First To Use Media Hub ◂ Discovered: 07/01/2025 Category: security	▸ Many third-party software fails security tests ◂ Discovered: 07/01/2025 Category: security

**Cyber Security Categories**
Google Dorks Database	Exploits Vulnerability	Exploit Shellcodes

CVE List

Tools/Apps