What Adobes New PDF Sandbox Really Means For Attackers

Adobe Reader Xs Protected Mode will make PDF attacks tougher to execute, but it cant stop every threat

It has been a busy year for Adobe security, issuing multiple patches for zero-day flaws and attacks aimed at its software as attacks on its pervasive Reader application have exploded. Now comes the official announcement of its expected Protected Mode sandboxing feature in the new Adobe Reader Version X.
Sandboxing basically quarantines any operations to a confined, restricted space so that if a PDF were infected with malware, the malicious code couldnt spread outside that file and into the system itself or to other files. The new feature is part of Adobes security strategy of hardening its code against attacks, says Brad Arkin, senior director of product security and privacy for Adobe.
Poisoned PDFs are one of the most popular vehicles for carrying malicious code, and security experts applauded Adobe for the new Protected Mode feature. Adobe has been systematically beefing up its security posture during the past year, starting with its
automatic updater feature for Reader and Acrobat
and a regular patching schedule. The company
first announced
the sandboxing approach this summer.
This is an approach I agree with, says security researcher Dino Dai Zovi, of the new sandboxing feature, which will be available next month. It will provide them more protection and faster than being able to release patches for all of the vulnerabilities they will find.
But just how much can the new Reader sandbox in Adobe Reader X deter attackers?
Adobes Protected Mode is aimed at stopping attackers from installing malware, recruiting bots, and conducting any malicious activity on a Reader users machine, Adobes Arkin says. The initial implementation of sandboxing is going to restrict the ability of Reader to process on a Windows machine and perform any write calls to the OS -- creating, changing, or deleting a filesystem file, kicking off new process, starting a new app, or tampering with a registry, he says.
An upcoming version of the feature will stop read calls from a PDF as well, so an attacker cant read or access file systems, he says.
Were hoping that [PDF] attacks will [now] be more difficult to carry out and will be less reliable, Arkin says. Our goal [with sandboxing] was to defend against all potential vulnerabilities that may still be latent in the code and that we havent found and fixed yet. We want to make attacks the bad guys are trying to do more expensive.
Readers sandbox does not, however, protect against phishing or social engineering-based lures. The sandbox does nothing against attacks where you have text inside a PDF that tells you to visit this URL and you submit your credentials [there], Arkin says.
It cant protect a user from a malicious link embedded in a sandboxed PDF, either. When you click on it, depending on how you have your settings, you will get a dialog box that asks if you want to open [the link], Arkin says. If you do, he says, you might be attacked with malicious code.
Nor can it save you from a poorly configured password for your PDF. A sandbox has nothing to do with the security of the file itself if the wrong person is able to open it, he says. And if youre using keys to do signatures or other cryptographic operations on PDFs, maybe you need to protect how you store those keys.
And like any software, a sandbox can be broken, says security expert Lucas Lundgren. We all have to remember that the sandbox solution is software-based, and software can be broken. Just like [Microsofts] DEP and ASLR, for instance: They sounded good, but in the end could be bypassed.
Lundgren sees the sandbox as an emergency, short-term solution. What they need to do is redesign PDF and Reader, tidy up the bloat, and then implement a sandbox solution, he says.
Adobe has battle-tested the sandbox and had outside white-hat hackers pound away at it as well. The overall design has proved to be sound, Adobes Arkin says. For an attacker to break out of the sandbox, he would have to find a flaw in it that has not yet been discovered, he says. Theres nothing were aware of that the bad guy can use. It doesnt mean its perfect, he says. Theres going to be so much research and work put into it that it may be possible to find flaws [eventually].
Researcher Dai Zovi predicts that researchers will show off some attacks on the sandbox at Black Hat this year, but no exploits will be out in the wild before that. He says its unclear whether attackers might use a Windows kernel exploit or an evasion method specific to Adobe to get their attacks through. It depends on the quality of their [Adobes] sandbox and how difficult it is to evade, he says. Attackers are research-constrained as well. They will go for the easiest way to target you.
With the Reader sandbox making it tougher for bad guys to send their payloads via a PDF, they could move to Java plug-ins or other increasingly popular targets, experts say.
Or modules within Reader could be used as another vehicle for malicious code, Dai Zovi says.
Meanwhile, Adobe already uses some sandboxing features in its Flash application and is currently working with Google Chromes development team to integrate Flash into the browser. Chrome uses the same sandboxing method that Reader is adopting, as does Microsoft in its Office 2010. We are working with Flash and Chrome [development teams] to extend that integration to include Flash in the Chrome sandbox, Arkin says.
Were hoping the bad guys will go elsewhere, he says.
Have a comment on this story? Please click Discuss below. If youd like to contact
Dark Readings
editors directly,
send us a message
.

Last News
▸ IoT Devices on Average Have 25 Vulnerabilities ◂ Discovered: 23/12/2024 Category: security	▸ DHS-funded SWAMP scans code for bugs. ◂ Discovered: 23/12/2024 Category: security	▸ Debunking Machine Learning in Security. ◂ Discovered: 23/12/2024 Category: security

**Cyber Security Categories**
Google Dorks Database	Exploits Vulnerability	Exploit Shellcodes

CVE List

Tools/Apps

News/Aarticles

Phishing Database

Deepfake Detection

Trends/Statistics & Live Infos

Tags:
What Adobes New PDF Sandbox Really Means For Attackers