US Intel Officials Share Their National Cybersecurity Concerns

  /     /     /  
Publicated : 22/11/2024   Category : security


US Intel Officials Share Their National Cybersecurity Concerns


Leaders in the security sector discuss the most pressing cyberthreats threatening the United States and what can be done to mitigate them.



National Intelligence director Dan Coats put the threat to national cybersecurity into context on July 13, 2018, when he said the warning lights are blinking red again in a speech before the Hudson Institute, a Washington, DC-based conservative think tank.
Coats was
trying
to get our attention, says Tonya Ugoretz, director of the Cyber Threat Intelligence Integration Center at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. She was one of several national security experts to take the stage today at Cyber Live 202, an event hosted by The Washington Post and focused on modern cyber threats to national security.
The system was also blinking red back in 2001, when intelligence and law enforcement agencies detected activity signifying a threat to the United States. Now its happening again, but its our digital infrastructure that could be under attack, Ugoretz explained. She cited Russia as the most aggressive foreign actor the department sees in cyberspace, with good reason.
Aggression is widespread, its against multiple sectors, its against multiple types of networks, she said. If we create a dialogue around sharing information, notifying victims if theyre hit with intrusion or influence campaigns, we can better plan our defense.
For example, the DHS and FBI issued alerts this year about Russias efforts against the US and allies, warning defenders to protect against Russian activity in critical infrastructure. The Justice Department now has a brand-new policy to disclose the existence of information warfare attacks against the US political system when there is high confidence in the foreign actor behind it.
These practices are helpful but ultimately weak without leadership from the top. The President himself does not take seriously the capability of Russian intelligence services, said Mike Rogers, former chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and national security commentator for CNN. Its very, very concerning to me.
Rogers was referring to the
recent meeting
between President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Helsinki, during which the US President
dismissed
Russian interference indictments related to activity during the US presidential election. While Putin was prepared for the meeting and knew what he would get out of it, Trump was not prepared, Rogers said.
The meeting played right into the information operations Russia had been conducting and will continue, he added. Theyre getting better at it and theyre getting more aggressive about it … this is what I worry about, Rogers emphasized. Intelligence officials monitor Russian bot operations trying to influence different topics every day, and the volume is getting bigger.
Intelligence experts agree a full government approach is needed to tackle the threat. One of the things no ones really done a good job of so far is imposing a cost on bad state actors for their activities, said Chris Painter, former and first-appointed cyber coordinator for the US State Department. The cost would both punish them and deter them from future activity, he said.
The President hadnt said, If this happens again there will be consequences … and I think a lot of people in government are waiting for that leadership, Painter continued.
Jason Matheny, director of the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA), spoke to the future and said one of cybersecuritys biggest threats is sort of boring: 70-80% of threats from nation-states and cybercriminals are social engineering attacks, he noted.
Within the next 5- to ten years, both threats and defenses will become more sophisticated due to machine learning, which is being used to detect phishing emails as they arrive. Theres now an arms race, he said, as people developing phishing attacks use the same technology to create subtle attacks that bypass advanced filters.
Related Content:
White House Cybersecurity Strategy At A Crossroads
Why Artificial Intelligence Is Not a Silver Bullet for Cybersecurity
70 US Election Jurisdictions Adopt Free Website Security Service
6 Ways to Tell an Insider Has Gone Rogue
 
 
 
Black Hat USA returns to Las Vegas with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier security solutions and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the
conference
 and
to register.

Last News

▸ Scan suggests Heartbleed patches may not have been successful. ◂
Discovered: 23/12/2024
Category: security

▸ IoT Devices on Average Have 25 Vulnerabilities ◂
Discovered: 23/12/2024
Category: security

▸ DHS-funded SWAMP scans code for bugs. ◂
Discovered: 23/12/2024
Category: security


Cyber Security Categories
Google Dorks Database
Exploits Vulnerability
Exploit Shellcodes

CVE List
Tools/Apps
News/Aarticles

Phishing Database
Deepfake Detection
Trends/Statistics & Live Infos



Tags:
US Intel Officials Share Their National Cybersecurity Concerns