U.S. Bank Attackers Dispute Iran Ties

Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Cyber Fighters resurface, not with new DDoS takedowns, but a media interview to explain their motives.

Who Is Hacking U.S. Banks? 8 Facts (click image for larger view and for slideshow)
Remember the Muslim hackers behind the Operation Ababil attack campaign against Wall Street banks, which saw leading U.S. financial firms websites disrupted at preannounced days and times?
The group thats claimed responsibility for the attacks -- calling themselves the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Cyber Fighters -- is back. Thankfully, however, its only to grant an interview.
After weeks of website takedowns, the last post to the groups Pastebin account, on October 25, 2012, announced that the group was pausing its
distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks
in honor of the Muslim Eid al-Adha holiday. That represented the culmination of six weeks of attacks that disrupted the websites of numerous firms, including Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo.
In
classic hacktivist fashion
, however, at the same time as it
announced the pause
, the group promised to grant a media interview. To commemorate this breezy and blessing day, we will stop our attack operations during the next days. Instead, we are going to have an interview with one of the American media and press about our ideas and positions, read the groups announcement. Every press volunteer to interview us, send its full specifications and offers to us throughout ([email protected]).
[ Symantec says Iranian accounting software is under attack, but Iran disputes the threat. See
Malware Corrupts Iranian Financial Databases
. ]
Curiously, the interview that resulted from that open offer was apparently granted to Flashpoint Partners, which describes itself as a consulting and data services enterprise focused on threat actors in cyberspace, and says its customers and partners include the Department of Defense, NBC and the Department of Justice.
What revelations does the
interview with Flashpoint Partners
contain? For starters, the hacktivists reiterated their previous assertions that the targeting of U.S. banks websites was in retaliation for the release of the
Innocence of Muslims
film that mocks the founder of Islam. A 13-minute clip of the film was uploaded in September to YouTube, and the group has demanded that the video be removed from the Internet.
The group argued in its interview that the website disruptions were commensurate with the perceived insult. We have not pursued any hit or destruction in the United States. We have selected the banks because we should have done something proportional to what has happened against us, they said. In the system where ... religion and sacred things are not honorable, and only material, money and finance have value, this seems a suitable and effective ... [action] and can influence governors and decision makers.
What are the hacktivists overall political aims? The name of their group apparently references Izz ad-Din al-Qassam, a Muslim holy man who fought against European forces and Jewish settlers in the Middle East in the 1920s and 1930s, according to
The New York Times
. But in the interview, the groups representative said the choice of name was apolitical. We dont have connection with any fractional or political structure, according to the group. Also we are not aware of nationality composition of our groups members. Our unifying and gathering factor is protesting against insulting sanctities.
U.S. government officials have
blamed Iran
for sponsoring the banking website disruptions for which the group has claimed credit. But in the interview, the hacktivists disputed that assertion. We are not dependent on any government. We merely wanted to protest against the insulting movie, they said. But there are some ones who want to portray this action as political. So they are deflecting the issue to the side of their political leanings.
Interestingly, the group also distanced itself from the
Hilf-ol-Fozoul blog
, which had suggested that the hacktivist groups attacks were the work of a crowdsourced, Anonymous-like operation. Instead, the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Cyber Fighters said the only official communications from their group are disseminated via their Pastebin account.
Asked whether or not the group was
using botnets
to attack service providers and hosting companies, as some security experts have suggested -- and
other security experts have disputed
-- the group said that any of [the] technical comments during the attacks have made us doubtful about [the] technical competence of American companies security consultants and noted that many of [the] technical statements about this case are not scientific, reliable or significant.
Has Operation Ababil now run its course? In the interview, the group of volunteer hackers threatened that unless the
Innocence of Muslims
film gets excised from the Internet, it could
resume its attacks
.

Last News
▸ ArcSight prepares for future at user conference post HP acquisition. ◂ Discovered: 07/01/2025 Category: security	▸ Samsung Epic 4G: First To Use Media Hub ◂ Discovered: 07/01/2025 Category: security	▸ Many third-party software fails security tests ◂ Discovered: 07/01/2025 Category: security

**Cyber Security Categories**
Google Dorks Database	Exploits Vulnerability	Exploit Shellcodes

CVE List

Tools/Apps

News/Aarticles

Phishing Database

Deepfake Detection

Trends/Statistics & Live Infos

Tags:
U.S. Bank Attackers Dispute Iran Ties