The Breach Disclosure Double Standard
Cybersecurity pros expect to be notified immediately when theyre breached, but most dont do the same – and some even cover up breaches.
For many cybersecurity professionals, swift breach disclosure is a matter of do as I say, not as I do. A
new survey
out today from Thycotic shows a big double standard exists between how quickly security pros expect their vendors and partners to disclose breaches and how fast they themselves tell others about security incidents.
Conducted across the IT security community convened at RSA Conference earlier this spring, the survey shows that 84% of respondents say they want to be notified immediately if a company theyve worked with has experienced a breach. Yet at the same time, just 37% of these people say they would extend the same courtesy of notifying customers expeditiously in the event that their firms were breached.
A big part of this may well be that companies dont have the capability for swift disclosure due to insufficient preparation on the incident response front. Only a little over half of the respondents say they have a tested incident response plan in place, while just one in five say theyve prepared a contact list and communications plan to manage an incident. Whats more, just one in ten organizations say they have a public relations and legal team prepped and ready to manage security incident communications should they be breached.
This lack of preparation is putting global organizations under considerable regulatory risk now that the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has gone live. One of the key requirements of GDPR is that organizations be ready to publicly disclose breaches that affect European residents data within 72 hours. A recent
study by Enterprise Strategy Group
shows that only 33% of organizations are ready to meet this mandate.
The high prevalence of companies unable to quickly detect breaches, let alone swiftly notify victims, is troubling enough. But perhaps even more disconcerting is how many organizations go out of their way to actively hide
incidents from being disclosed.
Indeed, almost one in six respondents admit theyve kept data breaches secret from the public or unsuspecting victims, according to Thycotics study. These kind of numbers arent a new revelation. Back in 2015, a
different survey
at that years RSA Conference, from AlienVault, found that 20% of respondents have at the very least witnessed their companies trying to hide or cover up a breach.
Whats new now, though, is the level of public furor kicked up following the egregious
under-the-carpet sweeping
behavior at Uber following its massive breach of 57 million peoples data. As the embarrassing details kept unfolding, it came out that the ride-share company paid an attacker $100,000 from a bug bounty program that usually only paid out a fraction of that per bug to cover up the breach.
Its this kind of lack of accountability thats pushing regulators to stiffen the consequences for organizations that fail to quickly notify affected parties after a breach. Not only is the big hammer of GDPR hovering over global organizations, but US regulators also are making noises. US legislators are
now toying with the idea
of sentencing executives with jail time for not disclosing data breaches.
https://img.deusm.com/darkreading/MarilynCohodas/InSecurityvplug-368592_DR18_DR-VE-Logo-Signature.png
alt= width=380 height=49 style=vertical-align: top; />
Top industry experts will offer a range of information and insight on who the bad guys are – and why they might be targeting your enterprise. Click for
https://event.darkreading.com/3453?keycode=sbx&cid=smartbox_techweb_upcoming_webinars_8.500000825
target=_blank>more information
|
Google Dorks Database |
Exploits Vulnerability |
Exploit Shellcodes |
|
CVE List |
Tools/Apps |
News/Aarticles |
|
Phishing Database |
Deepfake Detection |
Trends/Statistics & Live Infos |
Tags:
The Breach Disclosure Double Standard