Phish Bait: DMARC Adoption Failures Leave Companies Exposed

More than 90% of Fortune 500 companies leave customers and brand names vulnerable to domain name spoofing as a result of not fully implementing DMARC.

More than 90% of Fortune 500 companies have not fully adopted Domain-based Message Authentication, Report & Conformance (DMARC), leaving customers, business partners, and brand names exposed to phishing and other attacks that impersonate corporate email domains.
DMARC is a standard technology designed to verify whether an email is from the domain it claims to be from. It creates a whitelist of verified senders, and ensures only authenticated emails are delivered; fake messages are deleted before users see them. It can also be used to see how scammers are misusing corporate information in their attacks.
The email verification standard is the product of a 2007 experiment by Yahoo and PayPal to prevent account-credential phishing. A group of industry organizations including Google, Bank of America, Agari, and others scaled the experiment into what came to be known as DMARC in 2012.
Researchers at Agari recently analyzed public DNS records to learn about corporate DMARC adoption and policies. Their findings, published in the Global DMARC Adoption Report, reflect an overall failure to deploy DMARC across Fortune 500, FTSE 100, and ASX 100 companies.
There are multiple levels of DMARC adoption: Monitor, where unauthenticated messages are monitored but delivered to inboxes; Quarantine, where unauthenticated emails are moved to spam folders; and Reject, which blocks all unauthenticated messages from delivery to any folder
Two-thirds of Fortune 500 companies have not deployed any level of DMARC, according to the report. One-quarter has adopted the Monitor level, 3% have implemented the Quarantine policy, and 5% use Reject.
Monitor level watches for DMARC abuse but does nothing to prevent it, meaning companies can collect information but consumers are vulnerable. DMARC adoption is of little use unless companies use Quarantine or Reject, which is why
Agari reports
92% of the Fortune 500 is not protecting customers even though 25% have adopted the Monitor policy.
Patrick Peterson, Agari founder and executive chairman, desecribes DMARCs Monitor level for a healthcare consumer this way: Until the organization she does business with says quarantine the phish or reject the phish, theyre not actually protecting her and shes still vulnerable, he says.
Two-thirds of the Financial Times Stock Exchange (FTSE) 100 have not published any DMARC policy, 26% use Monitor, 1% have adopted Quarantine, and 6% have implemented Reject. Of the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) 100, 73% have not adopted any level of DMARC, 23% use Monitor, 1% use Quarantine, and 3% have implemented Reject.
It definitely shocked me, says Peterson of the low DMARC adoption rate.
There are several reasons companies are hesitant to pursue full DMARC adoption or havent deployed any level of policy. The dominant reason is education, he says. There are many security teams in the Fortune 500 that still dont understand how DMARC works. Oftentimes these companies are wary of new tech and dont want to be the first to try it. This is the case for DMARC, even though the technology has been around for more than five years, Peterson says.
This is new and different, he explains. Whether its easy or hard or theres playbooks or there arent … any time they have something new and different, a lot of them run for the hills because they tend to be more conservative. They dont like new and different, they like tried and true.
Some security teams understand DMARC but dont fully grasp the harm and abuse going on in company email channels. Business employees see email as their highest ROI form of communicating with customers and prospects, says Peterson, but security teams often dont.
When they learn how widespread email security problems are, they realize how much business process change is necessary before email is no longer the wild, wild West, he notes. Those without strong leadership will opt to wait on DMARC adoption and say, lets worry about this later.
Its time for more CISO leaders to wade into the business and take control of the situation, says Peterson. The take-charge mentality is necessary to push DMARC implementation, both within the business and across the industry. There is a majority adoption rate in the business services, financial, technology, and transportation sectors.
Peterson points to financial services as a champion for DMARC. Industry leaders Bank of America and JP Morgan, both involved in its creation, demonstrated its workability to other businesses and motivated them to use DMARC as well. If other organizations and industries took the same leadership profile, he says, DMARC adoption would increase.
Related Content:
72% of Government Agencies Hit with Security Incidents
Comparing Private and Public Cloud Threat Vectors
The Pitfalls of Cyber Insurance
Battle of the AIs: Dont Build a Better Box, Put Your Box in a Better Loop
Learn from the industry’s most knowledgeable CISOs and IT security experts in a setting that is conducive to interaction and conversation. Click for
more info
and to
register
.

Last News
▸ ArcSight prepares for future at user conference post HP acquisition. ◂ Discovered: 07/01/2025 Category: security	▸ Samsung Epic 4G: First To Use Media Hub ◂ Discovered: 07/01/2025 Category: security	▸ Many third-party software fails security tests ◂ Discovered: 07/01/2025 Category: security

**Cyber Security Categories**
Google Dorks Database	Exploits Vulnerability	Exploit Shellcodes

CVE List

Tools/Apps

News/Aarticles

Phishing Database

Deepfake Detection

Trends/Statistics & Live Infos

Tags:
Phish Bait: DMARC Adoption Failures Leave Companies Exposed