Megaupload Takedown Questioned By Users, Lawyers

Scrutiny increases from users and lawyers regarding the DOJs decision to block legally uploaded content and pursue criminal charges against file-sharing company..

10 Companies Driving Mobile Security (click image for larger view and for slideshow)
Did U.S. authorities overstep their jurisdiction when they pulled the plug on cyberlocker service Megaupload last week?
To make its case that the file-sharing site needed to be shuttered, the Justice Department Thursday seized Megauploads servers and released a 72-page indictment accusing seven Megaupload executives of racketeering, money laundering, and copyright violations, which allowed them to
amass $175 million in criminal proceeds
since the company was founded in 2005.
Legally speaking, the feds were able to execute their
takedown of Megaupload
in part because the company, which is based in Hong Kong,
hosted many of its servers in Virginia and Washington, D.C.
.
But the founder of Megaupload, Kim Dotcom (aka Kim Tim Jim Vestor, aka Kim Schmitz), has denied all of the charges leveled against him. Dotcom appeared Monday in a New Zealand courtroom, together with three other Megaupload executives whod been apprehended in that country at the request of U.S. authorities. All four men have requested bail, but police have labeled Dotcom a flight risk, saying he might have access to secret bank accounts abroad. Accordingly, the presiding judge said hell review the matter and issue a ruling by Wednesday, according to media reports, which will likely apply to all four men. Parole questions aside, experts estimate that extradition proceedings, if initiated by the United States, could take up to a year.
[ Read about how hacktivist group Anonymous retaliated for the DOJs takedown of Megaupload.
Anonymous Retaliates For Megaupload Raids: 10 Key Facts
. ]
Currently, Megauploads servers remain offline, and browsing to the site resolves to a graphic announcing that this domain name associated with the website Megaupload.com has been seized pursuant to an order issued by a U.S. District Court. The statement provides no indication of when any of the data stored by the site might be restored, if ever.
In response to the FBIs crackdown on Megaupload, file-sharing site
Filesonic
immediately disabled link sharing for uploaded content. According to a notice posted on the site: All sharing functionality on FileSonic is now disabled. Our service can only be used to upload and retrieve files that you have uploaded personally.
But users inability to access content that theyd legally stored on Megaupload has been leading to a populist backlash against the takedown. Academic Steve Su, for example,
told

The Sydney Morning Herald
in Australia that the FBIs mass takedown had inappropriately blocked legitimate content that hed uploaded for sharing with his students.
Its like confiscating everyones mobile phone because terrorists used them, he said. I dont think its correct to penalize the technology because, based on that logic, shouldnt the Internet be taken down, as this is how people infringe copyright?
Meanwhile, veteran Spanish privacy attorney Carlos Snchez Almeida, whos based in Barcelona, said the takedown
may have violated peoples privacy rights
under Spanish law. Accordingly, hes threatened to file suit over the Megaupload takedown. On his
Jaque Perpetuo blog
, Almeida wrote Friday that Spanish citizens who had accounts in Megaupload should collect as much information about the files that they had hosted, for the purposes of a possible claim against the U.S. government. In particular, the U.S. governments actions may conflict with Spanish data-access and privacy laws, especially if U.S. authorities begin accessing data that was stored by Megaupload.
Interestingly, the majority of Megauploads user traffic came from outside the United States, based on statistics from traffic measurement company Alexa. The greatest share of user traffic came from France (10%), followed by Brazil (8.8%), the United States (7.3%), and Spain (7.2%), reported
The Daily Caller
.
The Justice Departments tactics, including accusing a file-sharing website of racketeering, money laundering, in addition to copyright violations, has some U.S. legal experts asking whether the case would stand up in court. These actions, more suitable to the type of steps that the government takes against an organized-crime enterprise dedicated to murder, theft, and racketeering, are astonishing, said Jeff Ifrah, an attorney who co-chairs the American Bar Associations criminal justice section and committee on white collar crime, via phone.
The government seems to have ignored the fact that other popular content-sharing sites have successfully defended themselves in civil cases by using the safe harbor provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which provide immunity to a site that promptly takes down infringing content, he said.
To make the Justice Departments case, prosecutors must prove that safe harbor rules didnt apply to Megaupload. Accordingly, the indictment accused Megaupload executives of failing to remove copyrighted material from their site, even after copyright holders had requested it be removed. But Ifrah said its not clear whether Megauploads failure to remove certain pieces of content reached the level of criminal intent. Perhaps, instead, the company didnt receive some takedown notices, or disagreed with certain requests.
Furthermore, the governments racketeering charge--typically only used for mob cases involving drugs or gambling--suggests to Ifrah that prosecutors are overreaching. The allegations here are very similar to the allegations that were made in the YouTube case, in which Viacom accused the video-sharing site of
hosting almost 160,000 unauthorized pieces of content
, he said. Certainly no one accused YouTube of having mob-like activities.
The right forensic tools in the right hands are just a start. The new
Digital Detectives
issue of Dark Reading shows you how to better apply the lessons they teach. (Free registration required.)

Last News
▸ ArcSight prepares for future at user conference post HP acquisition. ◂ Discovered: 07/01/2025 Category: security	▸ Samsung Epic 4G: First To Use Media Hub ◂ Discovered: 07/01/2025 Category: security	▸ Many third-party software fails security tests ◂ Discovered: 07/01/2025 Category: security

**Cyber Security Categories**
Google Dorks Database	Exploits Vulnerability	Exploit Shellcodes

CVE List

Tools/Apps

News/Aarticles

Phishing Database

Deepfake Detection

Trends/Statistics & Live Infos

Tags:
Megaupload Takedown Questioned By Users, Lawyers