Kaspersky Lab Seeks Injunction Against US Government Ban

Revenues and reputation have taken a hit in the wake of the US Department of Homeland Securitys decision to prohibit use of its products and services by the feds, the company says.

Security vendor Kaspersky Lab has filed a motion for a preliminary injunction in its
lawsuit
challenging the US governments recent ban on the use of the companys anti-malware products by federal agencies.
The ban has seriously hurt Kaspersky Labs reputation and revenues and should be overturned expeditiously, the company argued in the motion filed Wednesday in US District Court for the District of Columbia.
The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) last September
ordered the removal of Kaspersky Lab software and services
from all federal information systems covered under the Federal Information Systems Management Act, and banned further use of all products from the company.
The ban, issued under DHS Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 17-01, stemmed from concerns about the firms ties to the Russian government and the belief that Russian agents had used the companys software to steal sensitive data from US government systems.
In its motion, Kaspersky Lab claimed the ban has caused considerable reputational damage and loss of sales to the company in North America. The debarment has precluded Kaspersky Lab from doing business with the US federal government, while hurting its consumer and commercial business as well, the motion said. US retailers that used to carry its products have now removed it from their shelves and are encouraging customers to switch to rival products, resulting in an overall decline in North American sales of over 50% during the second half of 2017.
According to Kaspersky Lab, the government issued the BOD without giving the company enough notice or enough of an opportunity to contest the evidence for the ban, thereby violating Fifth Amendment rights to due process. The BOD is also not supported by any substantial evidence and is therefore both arbitrary and capricious, Kaspersky Lab said in seeking an injunction overturning the ban.
DHS used the BOD to achieve a preordained result—the immediate debarment of Kaspersky Lab, and the consequential and foreseeable adverse effect on its U.S. commercial sales, the security vendor said in its motion.
The BOD achieved this result while depriving Kaspersky Lab of any meaningful or constitutionally sound process to challenge the tenuous, often anonymous, and uncorroborated media stories and other self-serving public statements which DHS relied upon to justify its action.
Ed McAndrew, a trial lawyer at Ballard Spahr, says Kaspersky Labs injunction is curious in what it does not seek.
After the ban went into effect, it was codified into law under the 2018 National Defense Authorization Act, he says, and as a result, the government will likely argue that Kaspersky’s challenge to the agency actions is moot.
Kaspersky Lab is attempting to use the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) to challenge DHSs administrative actions. But theres no need to focus on the administrative action because we now have the ban codified as a law, McAndrew says.
In addition, the DC federal court has previously already ruled in another case that the APA does not provide a basis for judicial review under FISMA, he adds.
The security vendors bid to get a temporary injunction — and eventually a permanent injunction— against the ban faces other legal challenges as well, McAndrew notes. To obtain injunctive relief the company will have to prove a variety of things, including the fact that it will suffer irreparable harm, and that issuing an injunction would be in the public interest. It is unlikely that the company will be able to satisfy any, let alone all, of the requirements, he says.
Winning the case may not be Kasperskys only objective, however, McAndrew notes. Seeking injunctive relief will provide Kaspersky with a public judicial forum in which to air its dispute with the governments action – and perhaps to attempt to repair its reputation.
If a hearing is held, Kasperksy Lab will have an opportunity to publicly present evidence disputing the disbarment while requiring the government to present public proof of the basis for its decision to ban Kaspersky Lab products, he says.
Related Content:
Kaspersky Lab Files Lawsuit Over DHS Ban of its Products
Kaspersky Lab Offers Up its Source Code for Inspection
Kaspersky Lab and the AV Security Hole
10 Security Product Flaw Scares

Last News
▸ There are plenty of online tools for reporting bugs. ◂ Discovered: 23/12/2024 Category: security	▸ 27 Million South Koreans Hit by Online Gaming Theft. ◂ Discovered: 23/12/2024 Category: security	▸ Homeland Security Background Checks Breach Raises Concerns. ◂ Discovered: 23/12/2024 Category: security

**Cyber Security Categories**
Google Dorks Database	Exploits Vulnerability	Exploit Shellcodes

CVE List

Tools/Apps

News/Aarticles

Phishing Database

Deepfake Detection

Trends/Statistics & Live Infos

Tags:
Kaspersky Lab Seeks Injunction Against US Government Ban