Judge Denies $20 Million Facebook Sponsored Stories Settlement

Settlement judge voice serious concerns over the proposal to divide $20 million between attorneys and consumer rights groups.

In a surprise turn of events, a Facebook settlement worth $20 million is headed back to the negotiating table.
U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg Friday denied the proposed settlement, which relates to a class action lawsuit filed last year first in U.S. District Court in California, which accused the social network of using Facebook users images for advertising purposes--as part of its
Sponsored Stories
program--without compensating them, in violation of California law.
Facebook ultimately negotiated a
proposed settlement
that would pay $10 million to the lawyers who filed the class action lawsuit, plus up to $300,000 in costs, and agreed in advance to not contest any of that payout.
In addition, Facebook was set to award a $10 million cy pres payment, meaning that in lieu of being paid out directly to people affected, its given to charities instead. Under the proposed settlement, the charity payouts would have gone to the Consumer Federation of America, Rose Foundation, Center for Democracy and Technology, Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood, Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society, and the Electronic Frontier Foundation,
reported
Wired
. But many privacy experts at organizations not included in the settlement dismissed the proposal, saying it did nothing to help the people whod actually had their likenesses misused by Facebook. In addition, the settlement would only allow users to limit--but not opt out from--how Facebook employs their images as part of Sponsored Stories. Minors, however, could opt out.
[ Social media is big business. Learn
Why McKinsey Values Social Economy At Up To $1.3 Trillion
. ]
The judge presiding over the settlement, however, asked how all parties involved had arrived at the recommended sums. There are serious concerns with the provision of the settlement agreement permitting plaintiffs to apply for up to $10 million in attorney fees without objection by Facebook, said Seeborg in his ruling. The fact that the parties negotiated that clear sailing provision separately from the cy pres payment does not wholly eliminate the concern that class counsel may have bargained away something of value to the class.
Facebook argued that providing direct compensation to affected users wasnt the best settlement course, since the per-user revenue that the social network derived from each person under Sponsored Stories was very little. But Seeborg noted that under the states Unfair Competition Law, which prohibits businesses from profiting on peoples likenesses without compensating them, the damages can be up to $750 per claim, irrespective of any advertising revenue Facebook may have earned. There is no dispute here that it would be impractical to the point of meaninglessness to attempt to distribute the proposed $10 million in monetary relief among the members of a class that may include upwards of 70 million individuals, he said. Even paying each class member the modest sum of $10 might require a settlement fund of $1 billion--assuming a class size of 100 million--apart from administration costs.
The judge said he wasnt recommending a $1 billion settlement--or, for that matter, any amount in particular. Instead, he called on the attorneys involved to provide better justification for why $10 million was an adequate cy pres award, demanded concrete estimates of the likely class size, and told attorneys to tell him just how many affected people they could accommodate via a settlement fund. Finally, he noted that it was unusual for Facebook to have agreed to the attorneys fees and cy pres award separately, as opposed to negotiating a lump sum, and said it suggested that the current cy pres award amount might be insufficient.
Although it is not a precise science, plaintiffs must show that the cy pres payment represents a reasonable settlement of past damages claims, and that it was not merely plucked from thin air, he said.
Attend Online Marketing Summit 2012 and gather the insights and strategies you need to make the right online marketing choices to deliver the most value for your business. The summit--in Santa Clara, Calif., Oct 22-25--offers four days of inspiration, connections, and practical learning. Register for
Online Marketing Summit
using code QJBQSA01 and receive a 25% discount on conference passes or a Free Expo Pass.

Last News
▸ ArcSight prepares for future at user conference post HP acquisition. ◂ Discovered: 07/01/2025 Category: security	▸ Samsung Epic 4G: First To Use Media Hub ◂ Discovered: 07/01/2025 Category: security	▸ Many third-party software fails security tests ◂ Discovered: 07/01/2025 Category: security

**Cyber Security Categories**
Google Dorks Database	Exploits Vulnerability	Exploit Shellcodes

CVE List

Tools/Apps

News/Aarticles

Phishing Database

Deepfake Detection

Trends/Statistics & Live Infos

Tags:
Judge Denies $20 Million Facebook Sponsored Stories Settlement