Hacking The APT

  /     /     /  
Publicated : 22/11/2024   Category : security


Hacking The APT


Google, SRA, Mandiant, McAfee execs profile the advanced persistent threat and suggest ways to derail it



Among the lessons learned by Google in the wake of the Aurora attacks last year: You need an A Team trained and ready to respond to an attack, and its time to think about making advanced persistent threat (APT)-type attacks more economically infeasible for the bad guys infiltrating the organization.
Heather Adkins, information security manager for Google, said the first thing the search engine giant learned after being hit by the targeted attacks last year known as Operation Aurora was that it takes a specialized, on-site team to respond: The first thing we learned was that we need an A Team to respond, said Adkins during a panel discussion on the APT at the RSA Conference in San Francisco last week. This is not an easy task to give you -- you have to evaluate the talent you have inside, what you need to educate them, and how you build your team. Your adversary [already] has one.
In the short term, she said, its all about making it harder and more expensive for attackers to target your organization and exfiltrate intellectual property and information after gaining a foothold. There are things you can do on your network to make it more costly for the adversary. You can change the economies of the game. Right now its too easy for them and the ROI is too high, Adkins said.
Kevin Mandia, president of Mandiant, echoed that sentiment. Lets make the cost of doing this so expensive for these folks so they have to earn it. They arent earning it now, Mandia said.
Among the measures Googles Adkins recommends is keeping systems patched as soon as fixes arrive and using two-factor authentication. Patch-day released Microsoft [software] should be your goal, she said. Were big fans of two-factor authentication ... If you can start identifying [users], its not going to be absolutely perfect, but it will make it that much harder for your adversary to get what they want when they get in.
Adkins said that investing in detection and prevention should be split fairly evenly. If you have a trained A Team, you can do it quite cheaply. Detection will get you the rest of the way, but you have to pick your technologies very carefully, she said. Whitelisting for endpoints is one option, she said, and monitoring all desktops and servers.
But not all organizations have the resources of a Google to recruit an A Team, and most organizations must assume today that they already have been infiltrated by one of these quiet, targeted, persistent attacks, experts say. If youve not yet experienced this and want to prepare for it, find someone in your [industry] peer group who has and have them come and brief your executives, Adkins said. They can give real-life, candid feedback on what its like.
With an APT, its not just about the malware, said Adam Meyers, director of cybersecurity intelligence for SRA International. Thats the initial foothold. Its [about] the lateral movement, what tools they are using, and what they are going after. All these data points become the definition of APT, he said.
And the attackers typically behave in similar ways. The behaviors repeat themselves, said George Kurtz, chief technology officer and executive vice president at McAfee. If you share [that information] across industries, you can prevent and detect any attacks, he said.
Unlike Stuxnet, an APT-type attack is all about espionage, not destruction. The threat actors I refer to as APT: Ive never seen them be destructive. They arent changing things yet, Mandia said.
A physically destructive act, such as shutting down the power grid, wont likely be responded with another power shutdown, he said in an interview after the panel session. If there is one response, its not going to be cyber ... its going to be F17s in the air. If you shut off the grid in L.A. ... theres not going to be some nerd in a room trying to hack them, he said. If they do that, were already at war.
Meanwhile, Googles Adkins questioned whether todays systems are actually defendable at all from APT-type attacks. In the long term, we have to evaluate whether our platforms can be protected, she said during the panel discussion. In the next five to 10 years, should we evaluate whether we start all over again?
Have a comment on this story? Please click Add Your Comment below. If youd like to contact
Dark Readings
editors directly,
send us a message
.

Last News

▸ Researchers create BlackForest to gather, link threat data. ◂
Discovered: 23/12/2024
Category: security

▸ Travel agency fined £150,000 for breaking Data Protection Act. ◂
Discovered: 23/12/2024
Category: security

▸ 7 arrested, 3 more charged in StubHub cyber fraud ring. ◂
Discovered: 23/12/2024
Category: security


Cyber Security Categories
Google Dorks Database
Exploits Vulnerability
Exploit Shellcodes

CVE List
Tools/Apps
News/Aarticles

Phishing Database
Deepfake Detection
Trends/Statistics & Live Infos



Tags:
Hacking The APT