Fixing Fragmentation Can Yield Tangible Benefits

Consolidating technology and breaking down functional silos can bring solid financial results, a new study finds.

The cyber security industry is well known for studies and reports that would, in the words of a line from the musical
1776
, …depress a hyena. Thats why the good news contained in a recent survey of more than 3,200 CISOs is newsworthy.
In a blog post announcing the results of the
2019 Cisco CISO Benchmark Study
, Steve Martino, senior vice president and chief information security officer at Cisco, wrote, There was a strong correlation between those who were extremely collaborative and the total cost of their most impactful breach, which was below $100,000―the lowest category of a breach cost.
According to John Maynard, Ciscos global security sales chief, that data agrees with conversations hes had throughout the industry. Fragmentation, both of technology and responsibility, is harmful to security because it makes it more difficult to get a full picture of the threat landscape and, Maynard says, you cant see, and you cant remediate what you cant get your arms around.
In some cases, Maynard says, companies are still struggling to bring order to a constellation of security point solutions. We see customers with 60 to 80 vendors in security, and its impossible to consolidate all the alerts coming in from those points, he says. On the other hand, the number of companies that are consolidating and reducing the size of their security product fleet is growing. In 2017, we had 54% who cited 10 or fewer vendors, and thats up to 63% in this survey, Maynard explains.
The other area where consolidation and cooperation are critical is in work between traditional operational silos. Collaboration between the networking teams, net ops teams, and security teams is important and companies that were able to do that saw a marked drop in the costs of their response, Maynard says, and drives the point home, explaining, the companies that cited the closest collaboration between networking and security saw the lower remediation costs.
In his blog post, Martino wrote that this suggests a very easy way for companies to reap tangible benefits: create a culture and set of processes where teams align on a single set of outcomes to break down silos between groups. And the metric for determining the success of those benefits is also straightforward, Martino wrote. Measuring outcomes against investments is the best data-driven approach to budgeting.
The study is not one of unending sunshine and congratulations: There are areas for improvement, including increasing the extent to which outcomes are used as a metric, improving alert management, and building a culture in which employees are a dramatically smaller piece of the threat landscape.
In the conclusion and recommendations sections of
the report
, Maynard says that there are two points that tie directly back to these metrics. Security budgeting should be linked to defined outcomes, and cyber insurance should be linked to funding, he says.
Related content:
To Mitigate Advanced Threats, Put People Ahead of Tech
Why Cybersecurity Burnout Is Real (and What to Do About It)
High Stress Levels Impacting CISOs Physically, Mentally
7 Tips for Communicating with the Board
The 5 Stages of CISO Success, Past & Future

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two cybersecurity summits at Interop 2019. Learn from the industrys most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the
Interop agenda
here.

Last News
▸ IoT Devices on Average Have 25 Vulnerabilities ◂ Discovered: 23/12/2024 Category: security	▸ DHS-funded SWAMP scans code for bugs. ◂ Discovered: 23/12/2024 Category: security	▸ Debunking Machine Learning in Security. ◂ Discovered: 23/12/2024 Category: security

**Cyber Security Categories**
Google Dorks Database	Exploits Vulnerability	Exploit Shellcodes

CVE List

Tools/Apps

News/Aarticles

Phishing Database

Deepfake Detection

Trends/Statistics & Live Infos

Tags:
Fixing Fragmentation Can Yield Tangible Benefits