Enterprise Physical Security Drives IoT Adoption

The vast majority of respondents to a new survey are deploying IoT technologies for building safety in the form of security cameras.

Enterprises are adopting Internet of Things devices to improve operational processes and cut costs, but the number one reason is for physical security, according to a survey released today.
Based on responses from 400 IT professionals at US, Canada, and UK enterprises, 32% of respondents point to a need for increased physical security as the top IoT adoption driver, according to the
State of IoT 2017-2018 report
. Other reasons for adoption cited by participants include improved operational processes (23%), reduced operational costs (21%), and simplified management (20%).
IoT Gets Physical
The Spiceworks research, which was commissioned by Cradlepoint, found the vast majority of survey respondents already use IoT technologies, with 71% deploying them for building security that largely comes in the form of security cameras.
People have different ideas of what is an IoT device. It can be a security camera, motion detector sensors, or an RFID tag on a hanger in a retail store, says Ken Hosac, vice president of IoT business development at Cradlepoint. These are block and tackle IoT projects.
Hosac says defensive forms of technology that keep a building or merchandise secure is not only a top motivator for enterprises to deploy IoT devices, but they are also among the easiest things to implement.
Mirai Considerations
But as IoT devices become more ubiquitous, so does the potential threat of a cyber attack on these devices. That notion is not lost on enterprises, with 40% of survey respondents listing cybersecurity as a top concern, according to the report.
Mirai, for example, commandeered vulnerable IoT devices, such as security cameras, to launch botnet-enabled DDoS attacks last year and
inspired a number of copycat IoT botnets
like Persirai.
Hosac advises enterprises to avoid placing IoT devices on their existing networks. Instead he recommends creating a new, separate network for IoT devices, or a software-defined perimeter network with a virtual network overlay on top of an existing network.
Enterprises think they can buy antivirus software they use on their desktops and laptops and put it on their IoT devices. But with IoT there is a mix of different types of security that is needed, he says, noting some devices are closed systems where it is impossible to even send a software update to the device.
Related Content:
A Checklist for Securing the Internet of Things
IoT: Insecurity of Things or Internet of Threats?
Securing IoT Devices Requires a Change in Thinking

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two days of practical cyber defense discussions. Learn from the industry’s most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the INsecurity
agenda here
.

Last News
▸ ArcSight prepares for future at user conference post HP acquisition. ◂ Discovered: 07/01/2025 Category: security	▸ Samsung Epic 4G: First To Use Media Hub ◂ Discovered: 07/01/2025 Category: security	▸ Many third-party software fails security tests ◂ Discovered: 07/01/2025 Category: security

**Cyber Security Categories**
Google Dorks Database	Exploits Vulnerability	Exploit Shellcodes

CVE List

Tools/Apps

News/Aarticles

Phishing Database

Deepfake Detection

Trends/Statistics & Live Infos

Tags:
Enterprise Physical Security Drives IoT Adoption