Dragonfly APT Now Able to Disrupt US Power Grid Operations, Symantec Warns

Recent attacks on energy sector targets suggest Dragonfly group has access to computers that control operational systems.

Concerns about the vulnerability of the US energy sector to cyberattacks resurfaced in a major way this week with a ominous warning from security firm Symantec about threat actors gaining the ability to potentially access and sabotage critical control systems.
In a
report
, Symantec said it has evidence showing that a previously known group it has dubbed Dragonfly has been carrying out a series of cyberattacks on energy sector targets in the US, Turkey, and Switzerland. Dragonfly, aka
Energetic Bear out of Russia
, has been associated with attacks on hundreds of organizations in the industrial, manufacturing, pharmaceutical, education, and construction sectors around the world since at least 2011.
The attacks have been going on since at least December 2015 and appear designed to gain access to systems used for power grid operations. Available evidence suggests that the intruders already have control of computers that have full access to such operational systems and thereby have the ability to disrupt them in future, Symantec said.
The latest wave of attacks suggests that the Dragonfly group has moved to a second, and markedly more dangerous phase in its operations.
In the past, Dragonflys attacks on power grid companies appeared to be focused on information gathering and learning how energy facilities operated. With the new attacks — which Symantec has christened Dragonfly 2.0 — the group seems to be applying that knowledge to try and gain access to operational systems in order to sabotage them.
The original Dragonfly campaign appears to have been exploratory in nature, while the new wave seems focused both on intelligence gathering and gaining access to operational systems, says Jon DiMaggio, senior threat intelligence analyst with Symantec Security Response.
There is only so much information that would be useful to an attacker from an energy-related victim, DiMaggio says. If not for financial gain or to steal intellectual property, then it is likely the attackers access would be to provide a strategic or military advantage. Turning off the power would do just that.
Cyberattacks on critical infrastructure targets have been a major concern in recent years. The 2012 Stuxnet attacks on Irans uranium enrichment facility in Natanz was the first to demonstrate how malware could be used to cause massive physical damage to critical control equipment.
Those concerns came into sharp focus again in late 2015 and a year later in December 2016 when a series of cyberattacks caused widespread power outages in Ukraine. Some vendors have blamed the 2015 attacks on a Russian threat actor named
Sandworm
, which is believed to have infected systems at a power plant in the country with a disk-erasing tool delivered via the BlackEnergy Trojan.
Earlier this year, security researchers at ESET and Dragos identified the malware used in the 2016 attack in Ukraine as Industroyer or CrashOverride, developed by a threat group they dubbed
ELECTRUM
.
The two firms described the malware as custom designed to sabotage electric grid operations by taking advantage of a widely used communication protocol in industrial control systems. The malware was capable of working against equipment from any vendor so long as the systems used the vulnerable protocol.
In contrast to the sophisticated malware used in these previous campaigns, the malware used in the Dragonfly 2.0 attacks are more run-of-the-mill tools that appear to have been deliberately chosen to avoid attention and attribution.
The attackers were observed living off the land to avoid detection and using multiple publicly available tools and resources making detection more difficult than the previous campaign, DiMaggio notes. Examples of such tools included PowerShell, Bitsadmin, and PsExec.
In some instances, the attackers have also been delivering backdoors and other malware using Flash updates and Trojanized versions of Windows applications such as MS Calc, Crash Reporter, and TCPview, he adds. The typical methods for distributing the malware have included spear phishing emails and watering hole attacks.
So far, Symantec has not observed any 0-day vulnerabilities or exploits being used in the Dragonfly 2.0 campaign. Some of the code strings in the malware used in the attacks have been in Russian while others have been in French, which suggests a deliberate attempt by the group to confuse security researchers about its origins, the security vendor said.
Galina Antova, co-founder of Claroty, says that reports about Russian actors being behind the Dragonfly 2.0 campaign are more than plausible. This adversary has already taken down the Ukrainian power grid twice - in December 2015 and 2016, Antova says. In addition to causing harm to Ukraine, these attacks may well have been a training ground for attackers that were practicing their tradecraft and building malware tools that can be used later against other targets.
At the same time, gaining access to control systems is the easy part, Antova notes. In order to cause actual damage - for example, turning off breakers that control power flow — specific control system knowledge is necessary, she notes.
While groups like Sandworm have demonstrated their proficiency in Ukraine, causing a large scale, cascading outage to the US grid is much more difficult and requires knowledge about safety systems and the resiliency controls that are in place, she notes. But an attack causing widespread damage is not out of the realm of possibility.
Leigh-Anne Galloway, cyber security resilience lead at Positive Technologies, says that her company has a SCADA demonstration stand at the companys annual security conference where people have previously demonstrated how easy it is to attack control systems.
In our experience, most infrastructure providers like energy companies are not well-prepared for an attack on their network, Galloway notes. They dont have the necessary monitoring tools in place and do not carry out regular testing against their infrastructure.
Related Content:
First Malware Designed Solely for Electric Grids Caused 2016 Ukraine Outage
Russian Cyberspies Hit Ukrainian, US Targets With Windows Zero-Day Attack
Lessons From The Ukraine Electric Grid Hack
Pharmaceuticals, Not Energy, May Have Been True Target Of Dragonfly, Energetic Bear

Last News
▸ Making use of a homemade Android army ◂ Discovered: 23/12/2024 Category: security	▸ CryptoWall is more widespread but less lucrative than CryptoLocker. ◂ Discovered: 23/12/2024 Category: security	▸ Feds probe cyber breaches at JPMorgan, other banks. ◂ Discovered: 23/12/2024 Category: security

**Cyber Security Categories**
Google Dorks Database	Exploits Vulnerability	Exploit Shellcodes

CVE List

Tools/Apps

News/Aarticles

Phishing Database

Deepfake Detection

Trends/Statistics & Live Infos

Tags:
Dragonfly APT Now Able to Disrupt US Power Grid Operations, Symantec Warns