Cybersecurity Stands as Big Sticking Point in Software M&A

The breach that was the fly in the ointment of the Yahoo-Verizon deal is one of many now surfacing as security of acquired firms starts to become a point of negotiation.

The mergers and acquisitions (M&A) market for software broke a lot of records last year, as investors took advantage of the convergence of cheap money and of societys growing dependence on software in every facet of personal and business life. But as the feeding frenzy continues, theres one big sticking point that rears its head more frequently than any other deal blocker in the software M&A game: cybersecurity.
A
new study out today
by West Monroe Partners and Mergermarket shows that cybersecurity issues frequently make problems both during due diligence and after the close of software M&A. The study found that cybersecurity was the number two reason why software deals were abandoned, only behind compliance, which in itself is usually wrapped up with existing security concerns.
Meantime, more than half of respondents to the survey say that they discovered a cybersecurity problem after a deal closed, indicating that theres still lots of room for improvement in how well acquisition targets are scrutinized for security problems before stakeholders sign on the bottom line.
Its a messy problem right now and the more competition in the marketplace the bigger that problem gets, says Sean Curran, senior director in West Monroes security and infrastructure practice.
Curran explains that because the power of the marketplace is frequently with sellers who are often courted by a number of firms, theyre much less likely to provide the necessary access to information and resources to conduct cybersecurity due diligence.
Its likely why the 16% of survey respondents say they were displeased with past experiences conducting cybersecurity due-diligence, compared to just 1% each for other forms of due diligence such as technology or operations.
Nevertheless, the frequency of cybersecurity due diligence is on an upward trajectory. At Currans firm, about 65% of the transactions they consult on each year now include some security due diligence - compared to zero just three years ago.
Technology attorney Randy Sabett agrees that security diligence is being brought up in greater frequency across not only many different types of M&A deals but also other types of formalized business agreements.
We are seeing on an increasing basis situations where the acquirer says Hey, this is a big issue to me. I really want you to dig in on it, says Sabett, who is special counsel for Cooley LLP in Washington D.C. In other cases, its one of those things where the acquiring entity might say Yeah, it’s an issue, but just make sure that they have done the things that they should have done. Not necessarily quite check the box, but not a deep dive. Somewhere in between.
Both Curran and Sabett agree that one of the biggest impediments to a smooth transaction is the discovery of an ongoing or recently uncovered breach. Last years announcement of a massive data breach at Yahoo that came right in the middle of the firms buy-out by Verizon is a poster child for this. The previously undisclosed breach ended up leading to Verizon knocking a massive $350M off of its purchase price of Yahoo.
According to the survey released today, over 35% of respondents reported cybersecurity or compliance issues as the number one issue that led them to walk away from a deal. Sabett says that even if these two issues dont directly lead to an acquirer wanting to walk away, they can cause a cascading effect of consequences that can put a deal in jeopardy.
Theyre the types of things that can crater the deal process - not necessarily the deal itself but they may significantly increase the time to close or maybe even change the deal terms in one form or another, he says.
According to Curran, beyond that, some other significant findings in diligence that can impact a deal include the unprotected storage of data, hoarding of very sensitive data, and the complexity of fixing issues to meet the acquirers risk tolerance levels. Take the case of software firms: if vulnerabilities exist within the fabric of the companys core architecture, that could be a big problem.
It really comes down to risk tolerance and why youre planning on buying the organization, he says. If I have to redevelop the software from scratch to remove those weaknesses, then is it really worth me buying the product that I ultimately have to reguild anyway? Or am I better off finding a competitor?
Related Content:
Deconstructing the 2016 Yahoo Security Breach
New Wave of Security Acquisitions Signals Start of Consolidation Trend
10 Free or Low-Cost Security Tools
WannaCry Exploit Could Infect Windows 10

Last News
▸ Some DLP Products Vulnerable to Security Holes ◂ Discovered: 23/12/2024 Category: security	▸ Scan suggests Heartbleed patches may not have been successful. ◂ Discovered: 23/12/2024 Category: security	▸ IoT Devices on Average Have 25 Vulnerabilities ◂ Discovered: 23/12/2024 Category: security

**Cyber Security Categories**
Google Dorks Database	Exploits Vulnerability	Exploit Shellcodes

CVE List

Tools/Apps

News/Aarticles

Phishing Database

Deepfake Detection

Trends/Statistics & Live Infos

Tags:
Cybersecurity Stands as Big Sticking Point in Software M&A