Cybersecurity on the Attack: Security Now Poll Results

The readers of Security Now have weighed in on the idea of cybersecurity teams going on the offense against hackers. Hackers might want to start worrying.

IT security tends to be all about defense: We leave the offensive tactics to the criminals. But according to the results of the latest Security Now poll, it might be time to rethink that strategy.
According to the 160 members of the community who responded to the flash poll, taking the battle to the hackers is something for IT security professionals to consider, even if theyre only taking the step in conjunction with the efforts of law enforcement. No matter how its done, though, it would be a major policy change for most organizations.
Roughly two thirds of those responding felt that fighting fire with fire in some way is justified, with almost twice as many favoring a blanket fight-back stance than those who prefer the idea of working with law enforcement.
In comments to the poll, community member (and Security Now blogger)
Joe Stanganelli
pointed out that there could be legal consequences to taking hacker-like steps without the explicit sanction of law enforcement. His cautionary note was echoed by community member
Michelle
, who brought up the ominous threat of unintended consequences if organizations suddenly felt free to hack back against criminals and criminal organizations.
Of course, taking the battle to the hackers can take many forms. Security Now community member
mhhfive
pointed out that he favors bug bounty and similar programs over more aggressive hack-back tactics for cybersecurity organizations. He also brought up the possibility of doxxing -- publicly giving out identifying information of hackers and hacking organizations so that the community at large can be aware of who the criminals are and take appropriate social action. Stanganelli once again weighed in with a voice of caution, citing costs to both society and innocent individuals from doxxing gone wrong.
Theres no doubt that frustration is mounting regarding the asymmetrical nature of the current cybersecurity environment; hacking is a low-risk activity for which the payoff can be huge. As with so many other frustrating law-enforcement situations, though, its worth thinking about the total cost to organizations and society of any remedy we decide to sanction. We could just fine that the cure, while emotionally satisfying in the short run, carries costs that we struggle to pay in the long run.
What do you think? Is it time to hack back? Let us know in the comments below and be sure to look for the next Security Now flash poll.
Related posts:
Cyber Insurance Builds for Business
Security for the Broken Business
Startup Attivo Advocates for Deceptive Security Protection
— Curtis Franklin is the editor of
SecurityNow.com
. Follow him on Twitter
@kg4gwa
.

Last News
▸ New threat discovered: Mobile phone ownership compromised. ◂ Discovered: 23/12/2024 Category: security	▸ Some DLP Products Vulnerable to Security Holes ◂ Discovered: 23/12/2024 Category: security	▸ Scan suggests Heartbleed patches may not have been successful. ◂ Discovered: 23/12/2024 Category: security

**Cyber Security Categories**
Google Dorks Database	Exploits Vulnerability	Exploit Shellcodes

CVE List

Tools/Apps

News/Aarticles

Phishing Database

Deepfake Detection

Trends/Statistics & Live Infos

Tags:
Cybersecurity on the Attack: Security Now Poll Results