Cutting Through The Mystique Of Testing The Mainframe

Mainframes are not enterprise dinosaurs -- theyre modern systems running mission-critical data that must be scrutinized as much as any other part of the IT infrastructure

BLACK HAT USA -- Las Vegas -- While most IT security teams tend to lump mainframe systems into the category of legacy systems unnecessary or impossible to scrutinize during regular audits, that couldnt be farther from the truth, says a researcher at Black Hat USA who this week released a number of free tools meant to help bridge the understanding gap between mainframe experts and security professionals.
I see them described as legacy all the time: Oh, we dont need to implement this policy because its a legacy system. Calling a mainframe legacy is like calling Windows 2012 Server legacy because parts of the Window NT kernel are still in the code. Or its like calling my car legacy because its still got tires, said Philip Soldier of Fortran Young, explaining that most enterprise mainframes today run off the IBM z/OS platform. Its not an old operating system -- its got all the same security controls youd expect from other modern operating systems.
Additionally, security folks shouldnt fall for the common misconception that mainframes are somehow slowly going the way of the dodo. In fact, Young mentioned the fact that theyre still going strong and that 70% of Fortune 500 companies run mainframes.
These companies are large companies and theyre processing their critical data through a mainframe, he said. Theyre not running their email servers on it and theyre not running their internal intranet sites. Theyre running critical data.
The difficulty with securing these highly sensitive environments is that the people tasked with testing and assessing mainframes generally have limited knowledge about how mainframes work. To demonstrate this, he took a straw poll amongst his audience members about who had ever been responsible for assessing or analyzing mainframes for security. He then asked those large number with their hands up to keep them up if theyd ever administered or implemented a mainframe before. Only one hand stayed up.
Meanwhile, he asked a similar question about how many people had been responsible for assessing Linux or Unix boxes and nearly all of the hands stayed up when he asked if they had ever administered or built those systems before.
Young stressed that not only is it really important for security people to push for better access to mainframes, work as a community to develop better tools for assessing them and dedicate the time to learning more about these systems,but time is of the essence. Because mainframes arent legacy systems and theyre not going to be retired from the enterprise anytime soon, the people who know the most about them will be. He pointed to statistics that show that over 75% of mainframe administrators are over 50.
In addition to walking the audience through a number of techniques to
probe a mainframes security
(PDF), Young said he hoped to spur the industry on to come together and develop better tools to automate mainframe security testing. He expressed particular frustration at the state of testing tools for the mainframe, which up until now have been virtually non-existent.
Theres really nothing out there, its really frustrating, he said. The tools that are there are out of date or theyre wrong. And theres no framework that includes z/OS. No Nessus, no NMAP and no Metasploit, he said.
Young has done his part to start getting auditors and testers the tools they need by showcasing at Black Hat
a number of tools
he developed that offer functionality like user enumeration, password sniffing and a way to turn a vulnerability in the fundamental way mainframes handle FTP traffic to execute commands on z/OS. However, he said there is more work to be done and he hopes other people can help as well.
Im working on getting some of these things implemented in Metasploit, and I need everyones help because its a very challenging environment -- you can understand that some people dont want these things developed so I cant ask for help from them, he said, explaining that even if security folk cant get access to their corporate mainframes due to worries about bringing down a mission critical production system, they can start experimenting on emulators, including the IBM zPDT and Hercules emulators.
Have a comment on this story? Please click Add Your Comment below. If youd like to contact
Dark Readings
editors directly,
send us a message
.

Last News
▸ Travel agency fined £150,000 for breaking Data Protection Act. ◂ Discovered: 23/12/2024 Category: security	▸ 7 arrested, 3 more charged in StubHub cyber fraud ring. ◂ Discovered: 23/12/2024 Category: security	▸ Nigerian scammers now turning into mediocre malware pushers. ◂ Discovered: 23/12/2024 Category: security

**Cyber Security Categories**
Google Dorks Database	Exploits Vulnerability	Exploit Shellcodes

CVE List

Tools/Apps

News/Aarticles

Phishing Database

Deepfake Detection

Trends/Statistics & Live Infos

Tags:
Cutting Through The Mystique Of Testing The Mainframe