Customers Punish Breached Companies

Equifaxs 25% reduction in share value and other industry-wide stats show that consumers arent so apathetic about cybersecurity after all.

Many executives dont take secondary breach costs very seriously: the numbers have long been tricky to pin down and many within the C-suite believe that consumer breach fatigue and apathy about cybersecurity buffer their brand in the wake of a breach.
But growing evidence is showing that customers really do care, and theyll put a wallop on the brand when the circumstances are egregious enough.
This is coming crisply into focus in the wake of the Equifax breach. Yesterday the firm released its third quarter earnings results, along with estimates of primary breach costs like forensic investigation, remediation, and consumer credit reporting. The contrast between the two sets of numbers should act as an example to CEOs and board directors as to the true risk that big breaches can pose to income and business health.
According to Equifax, breach costs are currently measuring up to approximately $87.5 million. More troubling, though, is the precipitous drop in revenue Equifax experienced in the wake of the breach.
In 2017 the credit reporting agency was flying high with huge quarterly increases in net income. First quarter saw a 25% quarter-to-quarter gain and a whopping 50% gain in revenue compared to first quarter of 2016. Second quarter saw an 8% quarterly gain and a 26% rise in net income compared to second quarter of 2016, up to $165.4 million.
Then the breach made the engines fall off - after the early September announcement, revenue plummeted to $96.3. That is an incredible 42% quarterly drop in net revenue, and a 27% drop compared to the same time period last year. And thats just net revenue: Share value has been similarly ravaged. Since the September 7th breach announcement, the firm has lost just over a quarter of its stock valuation.
The circumstances with Equifax are different compared to mega breaches of the past, where company stock valuations have bounced back fairly quickly. The TJXs and Targets of the world primarily deal in goods and services, but Equifaxs core business is in
information
. Protecting it should be a core competency and customers and shareholders are ticked.
Nevertheless, this event may be still be a global bellwether that shows that consumers and shareholders have had it with all breached companies. Their antennae are up with regard to how companies deal with their private data, and theyll change their behavior if they have evidence that companies arent doing what they need to protect that data.
Just this week
a Gallup poll
showed that two-thirds of consumers today worry about hackers stealing their financial information - nearly double the amount of those worried about having their car broken into, being burglarized, or being the victim of terrorism.
Meantime, other market data has bubbled up this year that translates that concern into real brand value impacts for companies that arent doing their security due diligence. A study in September by
YouGov BrandIndex
tracked brand scoring of a number of major brands following a mega breach in recent years. Equifax saw the most precipitous drop in brand scoring, but other companies like Anthem Blue Cross, Home Depot, and Ebay all saw attrition to their scores in the wake of a breach.
Meanwhile, earlier this year
Ponemon Institute concluded
that in a study of 113 companies they suffered an average 5% drop in stock value following the disclosure of their breach. The firm showed that nearly a third of consumers report terminating relationships with breached companies in the wake of the incident.
Its a worry that CMOs and marketing directors at least recognize. Within this audience almost three-quarters say that the biggest cost of a security incident is loss of reputation and brand value. Thats way more than the fewer than half of IT leaders who would agree with that sentiment.
Consumers and shareholders are tangibly holding companies responsible for consumer personally identifiable information (PII), and for data leaks and breaches, says Lisa Baergen, marketing director for NuData Security, a Mastercard company. Companies need to break past outdated notions. While internal departments debate responsibility, consumers and shareholders are holding the brand responsible – making it everyone’s problem. The tangible economic impacts of breaches will only grow.

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two days of practical cyber defense discussions. Learn from the industry’s most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the INsecurity
agenda here
.

Last News
▸ 7 arrested, 3 more charged in StubHub cyber fraud ring. ◂ Discovered: 23/12/2024 Category: security	▸ Nigerian scammers now turning into mediocre malware pushers. ◂ Discovered: 23/12/2024 Category: security	▸ Beware EMV may not fully protect against skilled thieves. ◂ Discovered: 23/12/2024 Category: security

**Cyber Security Categories**
Google Dorks Database	Exploits Vulnerability	Exploit Shellcodes

CVE List

Tools/Apps

News/Aarticles

Phishing Database

Deepfake Detection

Trends/Statistics & Live Infos

Tags:
Customers Punish Breached Companies