California Proposes Do Not Track Honesty Checker

After DNT standards development stalls, legislators and advertisers seek new path forward on browser privacy.

Anonymous: 10 Things We Have Learned In 2013 (click image for larger view and for slideshow)
Memo from California legislators to website owners: Tell us if youre honoring the Do Not Track (DNT) flag in peoples browsers.
Thats the intent of AB 370, a bill introduced earlier this year by Al Muratsuchi, a former state prosecutor who was elected to the California Assembly in November 2012.
This bill would require an operator to disclose whether or not it honors a request from a consumer to disable online tracking, reads the draft legislation. The bill would also require an operator to disclose if it does not allow third parties to conduct online tracking on the commercial Web site or online service.
[ Employee surveillance can be a slippery slope. Read
Watching Workers: Wheres The Line?
]
The proposed legislation sounds a rare note of clarity in the contentious debate surrounding
do-not-track proposals
, asking website operators simply: Do you honor consumers do-not-track requests?
Working with the World Wide Web (W3C) Consortium, the advertising industry, browser developers and privacy advocates were already supposed to have developed a global
Do Not Track
standard, as was proposed last year in President Obamas Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights.
But the DNT standards work
stalled in November 2012
, prompting advertisers and marketers to focus again on self-regulation, after
Microsoft enabled DNT by default
in Internet Explorer 10. The Association of National Advertisers (ANA) reacted with outrage, as did some technology backers of the developing DNT standard, with the ANAs president and CEO
playing the emotional card
and expressing his profound disappointment at Microsofts move.
Advertisers subsequent inability to seal a DNT deal, however, didnt endear them to some members of the Senate Commerce Committee, which Wednesday held a status update on the development of voluntary do-not-track standards.
Luigi Mastria, managing director of the Digital Advertising Alliance (DAA), told the committee that his group, in conjunction with numerous other advertising and marketing industry groups, had already created a one-button choice mechanism to stop the collection and use of Web viewing data for consumers. The advertising industry has long argued against DNT, saying that it would compromise the ability of sites to offer content to consumers without making them pay for it.
But Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV), the committee chairman, said the one-button choice mechanism wasnt enough, and called on all players to honor the DNT standards work to which theyd committed. Its now April 2013 and
consumers are still waiting for these do-not-track standards
, Rockefeller said, reported
USA Today
. I believe these companies are dragging their feet.
Rockefeller, whos due to retire from Congress at the end of 2014, in February introduced the Do-Not-Track Online Act of 2013. He introduced an earlier version of the bill two years ago but
didnt push the bill through the Senate
after the advertising industry said it would develop a DNT standard.
Rockefellers bill calls for the development of a DNT standard and penalties for any businesses that dont abide by it. I do not believe that companies with business models based on the
collection and monetization of personal information
will voluntarily stop those practices if it negatively impacts their profit margins, he said at the committee hearing, reported Associated Press.
But not everyone thinks that a legal solution would work. Generally speaking, when it comes to privacy protection, we should
avoid placing excessive faith in schemes like Do Not Track
because they could fail, just as previous techno-fixes failed to keep pace with fast-moving developments in this space, Adam Thierer, senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, told the committee. Instead, he noted that concerned consumers can already
safeguard their privacy
using a number of free tools, including
HTTPS Everywhere
and
VPN services
.
If our fear is that consumers lack enough information to make smart privacy choices, then lets work harder to educate them while pushing for greater transparency about online data collection practices, said Thierer. Finally, we should remember that not everyone shares the same privacy sensitivities and that citizens also care about other values, such as cost, convenience, and choice.

Last News
▸ ArcSight prepares for future at user conference post HP acquisition. ◂ Discovered: 07/01/2025 Category: security	▸ Samsung Epic 4G: First To Use Media Hub ◂ Discovered: 07/01/2025 Category: security	▸ Many third-party software fails security tests ◂ Discovered: 07/01/2025 Category: security

**Cyber Security Categories**
Google Dorks Database	Exploits Vulnerability	Exploit Shellcodes

CVE List

Tools/Apps

News/Aarticles

Phishing Database

Deepfake Detection

Trends/Statistics & Live Infos

Tags:
California Proposes Do Not Track Honesty Checker