BlueKeep Exploits Appear as Security Firms Continue to Worry About Cyberattack

The lack of an attack has puzzled some security experts, but the general advice remains that companies should patch their vulnerable systems more quickly.

When Microsoft originally issued an alert for a remotely exploitable software flaw in mid-May, security firms immediately drew analogies between the danger posed by the so-called BlueKeep vulnerability and the destruction caused by the ETERNAL BLUE exploit, reportedly stolen from the National Security Agency and used to enable the pernicious WannaCry worm to spread in 2017.
Within a week, companies reported they had created successful exploits for the flaw. Researchers from McAfee, for example, analyzed the patch and
created a proof-of-concept
that could launch an app on the computer. In early July, Sophos showed off
an exploit that compromises systems using a fileless attack
.
However, the massive cyberattack forecasted by security firms — and worried over by Microsoft, the US Department of Homeland Security, and others — failed to materialize. The lack of a public exploit is a major reason, as is the difficulty of writing one from scratch, says David Aitel, chief security technical officer at Cyxtera, which last week announced it had incorporated a complete exploit for the BlueKeep vulnerability into its penetration-testing product, Canvas.
It is not trivial, he says.
Eleven weeks after Microsoft announced it had patched the critical software issues, the lack of an exploit for BlueKeep continues to puzzle some security professionals. BlueKeep (
CVE-2019-0708
), a vulnerability in the way older versions of Windows handle remote desktop protocol (RDP) messages, can allow an attacker to run code on systems with the service accessible from the Internet.
Yet, while a catastrophic worm is the obvious threat, other, more subtle dangers exist as well, says Dan Dahlberg, director of security research at BitSight.
You think of the activities of the sorts of people trying to take advantage of this vulnerability for nefarious pourposes — there are people who are less experienced, who would likely turn it into a worm, he says. But there are other actors who might utilize this vulnerability in a much more stealthy manner, and that is going to be much harder to detect.
In early July, BitSight found that some 800,000 computers still exhibited external signs of vulnerability to BlueKeep. About 5,000 systems are patched daily, Dahlberg says.
Dahlberg and other security experts have urged companies to continue patching. Microsoft issued updates for a variety of its platforms — not only in Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008, the core systems affected by the issue, but also Windows XP and Windows 2000, both of which the company has stopped otherwise supporting.
Microsoft also has published two blog posts recommending that customers apply the updates as soon as possible.
It is possible that we wont see this vulnerability incorporated into malware, the company said. But thats not the way to bet.
Typically, attacks skyrocket after a public exploit. In 2012, Symantec researched analyzed malware for the use of previously unknown exploits, so-called zero days. The company found out of 18 exploits used in malware, 11
had not been known at the time the malware initially infected systems
. Yet, once the exploits became public, use of the attacks jumped by a factor of 100,000 in some cases.
The lack of a public exploit may explain why there has been no catastrophic attack, because those groups that have exploits — security companies and government intelligence organizations — will use them only for a focused purpose. The WannaCry worm, attributed to North Korea, occurred only after the exploit had been publicly released.
The reason that we have not seen a big malicious worm like WannaCry, that may have more to do with geopolitics and the state of US-Russia relations than anything else, Cyxteras Aitel says.
In the past, security firms that have created exploits have faced criticism, yet the security community has recognized the legitimacy of researching potential attacks by creating exploits. The addition of exploit code into Cyxteras Canvas has caused much less consternation than in the past.
Our objective is to help customers solve their risk problems, Cyxtera said in a statement. Its not just about BlueKeep — there will always be another vulnerability that comes along and puts you at risk.
Related Content:
Microsoft Urges Businesses to Patch BlueKeep Flaw
DHS Tests Remote Exploit for BlueKeep RDP Vulnerability
800K Systems Still Vulnerable to BlueKeep
RDP Bug Takes New Approach to Host Compromise
Zero-Day Attacks Long-Lived, Presage Mass Exploitation
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations

Black Hat USA returns to Las Vegas with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier security solutions, and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the
conference
and
to register.

Last News
▸ ArcSight prepares for future at user conference post HP acquisition. ◂ Discovered: 07/01/2025 Category: security	▸ Samsung Epic 4G: First To Use Media Hub ◂ Discovered: 07/01/2025 Category: security	▸ Many third-party software fails security tests ◂ Discovered: 07/01/2025 Category: security

**Cyber Security Categories**
Google Dorks Database	Exploits Vulnerability	Exploit Shellcodes

CVE List

Tools/Apps

News/Aarticles

Phishing Database

Deepfake Detection

Trends/Statistics & Live Infos

Tags:
BlueKeep Exploits Appear as Security Firms Continue to Worry About Cyberattack