AI Prepares for Security Spotlight

Versive puts AI to work finding and identifying cybersecurity threats.

Theres a lot of talk about the budding application of AI in security. Its potential as a tool to assist analysts is growing, whether they need support refining threat volume, or need to build more advanced predictability or confidence into assessments.
But it can also be a hindrance, is currently immature in the industry, and is over-hyped. Because its relatively new, it is marketed as a solve-all and thats not helping enterprises define what role or value it has for them. Its time to aim for tangible results from better-qualified investments.
Dustin Hillard, founder and CTO at Versive
Whats basically an intractable problem today is that there is a lot of valuable data out there if [analysts are] actually able to distill it down and comprehend it, Dustin Hillard, founder and CTO at Versive, a firm that uses AI for adversary detection, told Security Now.
Hillard left academia as a highly qualified electrical engineer and in the last decade was a data scientist for Yahoo, thinking up new machine-learning-based advertising relevance and search algorithms, and then a senior scientist for Microsoft, developing Cortana.
He advocates that AI be employed to examine the big picture core threat behaviors in the adversary lifecycle, rather than individual data sets. Todays threat analysis tools, which in some cases are similar to ones that hackers use to extract data, are passive and look only for data artifacts.
AI puts together the human understanding that it takes to create an overall narrative of whats happening, tying together separate events into an overall story, said Hillard. Effectively, AI can act as a filter between more traditional tools that generate vast numbers of alerts, and the analysts, aiming to reduce the number of cases. The idea is to identify issues faster than the average time it takes a hacker can be inside the network -- 100 to 200 days.
Conventional tools create on average 17,000 alerts, but only about 20% are considered reliable and less than 5% investigated (sources
The Cost of Malware Containment
, a report conducted by the Ponemon Institute, and
M-trends 2015: A View From the Frontlines,
, a report from FireEye). AI can combat these statistics and act as an interpretive system for analyst teams.
But outside of this application in the industry, the utility of AI is in question. In some instances, AI is an overactive brain that actually makes security situations more difficult.
There are many ways in which AI can make the situation worse, the primary being when anomalies are generated for anomalies sake, said Hillard, theyre not aligning them and prioritizing them against the true risk.
Also, sometimes, its difficult to interpret why a result was generated by AI, and analysts dont know if the system is in fact wrong or if its being incredibly smart and presenting information for a novel reason thats tough to understand. One aspect missing from AI tools is the ability to provide the context of results, making them more easily actionable.
With new AI systems, that represents a steep learning curve in understanding how to use the output to gain an advantage against attackers. Perimeter defense helps, but its very difficult to defend against a hacker team that is well resourced and has access to novel threat technology, versus enterprise experts who have good knowledge but statistically cant hope to catch everything and plug the gaps.
AI can also help bridge knowledge gaps caused by the current shortage of analysts. According to Versive, the recruitment market is turning into a battleground for experts, resulting in competition between IT security developers and people working in, say, the financial, pharmaceutical or consumer web verticals. We need automated processing because youll never be able to hire enough people, said Hillard.
Security professionals are extremely difficult to find and keep. According to Forbes, there will be a global shortage of about 2 million positions within a year, with security analysts one of the most in demand. In the fight for senior security talent, lead engineers can even make more than CISOs (according to Dice, an IT recruitment firm).
Related posts:
Cybersecurity Skills Gap Hits Across the Board
Demisto Brings Bots to Security Noise
Is Your Security Military-Grade?
— Simon Marshall, Technology Journalist, special to Security Now

Last News
▸ Some DLP Products Vulnerable to Security Holes ◂ Discovered: 23/12/2024 Category: security	▸ Scan suggests Heartbleed patches may not have been successful. ◂ Discovered: 23/12/2024 Category: security	▸ IoT Devices on Average Have 25 Vulnerabilities ◂ Discovered: 23/12/2024 Category: security

**Cyber Security Categories**
Google Dorks Database	Exploits Vulnerability	Exploit Shellcodes

CVE List

Tools/Apps

News/Aarticles

Phishing Database

Deepfake Detection

Trends/Statistics & Live Infos

Tags:
AI Prepares for Security Spotlight