These strikebacks are controversial in the world of cybersecurity, as they represent a shift from the traditional defensive strategies that most countries employ. By actively retaliating against cyber attackers, the United States hopes to deter future attacks and protect its critical infrastructure from ongoing threats.
Furthermore, the use of strikebacks blurs the line between defensive and offensive cyber operations, raising concerns about international norms and rules of engagement in cyberspace. It also brings up issues of attribution and accountability, as accurately identifying the source of a cyber attack is often difficult and prone to error.
However, the use of strikebacks also raises concerns about the potential consequences and unintended effects of such actions. As cyber warfare continues to evolve, policymakers will need to carefully consider the ethical, legal, and strategic implications of employing offensive cyber operations in response to cyber attacks.
What are cybersecurity strikebacks?
How do cybersecurity strikebacks work?
What are the risks of using cybersecurity strikebacks?
Are cybersecurity strikebacks effective in deterring attacks?
What are the legal implications of cybersecurity strikebacks?
Google Dorks Database |
Exploits Vulnerability |
Exploit Shellcodes |
CVE List |
Tools/Apps |
News/Aarticles |
Phishing Database |
Deepfake Detection |
Trends/Statistics & Live Infos |
Tags:
Obama authorizes cyber strikebacks.